Blog Series: The Top 5 Areas Most Investors, Startups, and Companies Don't Understand About Air Traffic Management

Series Introduction

Our discussion highlights a core reality that many investors, startups, and technology companies entering aviation underestimate: air traffic management (ATM) modernization is not primarily a technology problem, it’s a system-integration problem shaped by time variability, operational complexity, imperfect data, human behavior, public acceptance, and real-world constraints. 

Our Panel emphasizes that success in aviation innovation depends less on whether a vehicle or software works in isolation and more on whether it can operate reliably inside a crowded, constantly changing national airspace system (NAS) alongside airline, business aviation, general aviation, drones, and future AAM operators. 

They argue that reducing time variability, improving data accuracy and collaboration, understanding the strategic relationship between ATM and ATC, and accounting for political, community, and operational realities aren’t solved by the occasional naive comments often mentioned in investor decks, (e.g., “we’ll stay away from the big airports,” or even not realizing that the airspace is often a major constraint). 

Ultimately, the companies most likely to succeed will be those that deeply understand how the aviation system actually behaves under pressure and then design their technologies and business models accordingly.

It seems every week, new companies announce plans to put aircraft, drones, or air taxis into the sky. The pitch decks are polished. The investor interest is real. In many cases the technical idea genuinely works. But often the technology can't "fit" into the airspace where it must be used.

If the proposed idea doesn't come with a viable plan to fly within the constraints of existing airports, ATM, flight data systems, exclusion zones, community reaction, ground transport, scheduling, reservations and booking, it's just a technological demonstration — not a commercial proposition.

But again and again, the people who have spent careers inside the air traffic management system notice the same gaps. The same things get glossed over. The same assumptions get made.

It seems every week, new companies announce plans to put aircraft, drones, or air taxis into the sky. The pitch decks are polished. The investor interest is real. In many cases the technical idea genuinely works. But often the technology can't “fit” into the airspace where it must be used. If the proposed idea doesn't come with a viable plan to fly within the constraints of existing airports, ATM, flight data systems, exclusion zones, community reaction, ground transport, scheduling, reservations and booking, it's just a technological demonstration, not a commercial proposition.

But again and again, the people who have spent careers inside the air traffic management system notice the same gaps. The same things get glossed over. The same assumptions get made.

We recently sat down with three of those veterans with Jim Barry moderating. Jim was joined by 

  • Tom White,  a seasoned ATM leader with more than three decades of experience developing strategies for some of the world’s most complex ATM systems.

  • Lorne Cass, an executive leader with deep expertise in airline operations control, FAA air traffic management, airport efficiency, and aviation safety.

  • Mark Hopkins, who brings over four decades of experience in airline operations and air traffic management. He recently retired from Delta Air Lines, where he served as Director of Air Traffic Management and Collaborative Decision Making (CDM).

Their discussion centered on five areas they most want investors, startups, and new entrants to understand about air traffic management.

We're publishing this discussion as a two-part series:

  • Part 1: You Are Not Operating on an Island / Every Schedule Is Perfect Until the First Plane Moves — June 1st, 2026 at 12:00PM ET

  • Part 2: Stop Talking About Efficiency. Start Talking About Time / Collaboration and Accurate Information / The Public Has a Vote. So Does the Hill. — June 3rd, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET